• Cart
Log in

Log in

home page banner blank


Step 5 – Reporting the Results

During the reporting phase of a performance audit, auditors produce a report that presents their audit observations and conclusions. Audit reports vary considerably in scope and nature. In addition, the formats and writing styles of performance audit reports are specific to individual audit offices. As a result, there is no standard way to present audit findings. However, there are a few general principles that auditors should apply when reporting audit findings that were obtained through generalizable or purposeful sampling.

Describing the Sampling Methodology

Transparency is a good practice when explaining the methodology and approach used by the audit team. It is also indirectly required by audit standards used by performance auditors that call for, where appropriate, a description of any significant inherent limitations associated with the measurement or evaluation of the underlying subject matter against the applicable criteria. Transparency ensures clarity while informing recipients of the audit report of the audit findings’ rigor and overall reliability. This is especially true when a form of sampling has been used. While it is not necessary to report all the details that should be included in the working papers (see the section Documenting the Plan and Its Results), readers should be able to form an educated opinion with respect to the reliability and soundness of the sampling methodology used. It is suggested that the key elements that could be included in the audit report are:

  • sampling approach (generalizable or purposeful)
  • size of the population and size of the sample
  • confidence interval and confidence level (for generalizable sampling)3
  • explicit description of rationale for method of selection (for purposeful sampling)4

An example of a sampling methodology description is in Text Box 3.

Text Box 3 – Describing a Sampling Methodology: An Example

Audit: Office of the Auditor General of Canada – Preventing Illegal Entry into Canada, published Fall 2013

Description of the sampling methodology:

“In addition, we conducted file reviews of the following representative samples of border-related activities:

  • a sample of 102 flights (45 from the United States and 57 from other international destinations) from a population of 61,684 carrying 5.6 million passengers arriving in Canada between 1 September and 30 November 2012, and a sample of 306 passengers from the population of approximately 15,000 on those 102 flights, to assess whether complete advance passenger information was provided to the Agency;
  • a sample of 49 targets from a population of 998 targets issued in March and April 2013, to assess whether air passenger targets were working as intended; and
  • a sample of 49 cases from a population of 1,427 Integrated Border Enforcement Team reports and a sample of 43 cases from a population of 476 Marine Security Enforcement Team reports in the RCMP’s Police Reporting and Occurrence System and its Police Records Information Management Environment databases for the fiscal years 2011–12 and 2012–13, to assess whether those teams were able to respond to known border occurrences.

The results for each of the random samples is considered accurate to within 10 percent, 9 times out of 10.”

 

3 This provides the information required regarding significant inherent limitations of the measurement as required by CASE 3001 73.
4 Idem.